🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand councils is set to be cut by more than half, following a divisive law change that forced local governments to put the future of hard-won Māori seats to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have multiple elected officials based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, local governments could only establish a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a community referendum in their region. Communities often spent years building local support and urging their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the current administration overturned the policy, saying communities should decide whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The new legislation required local authorities that had created a ward under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which ended on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 decided to retain their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results represented “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics however have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the coalition government has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to measures designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it aims to end “race-based” approaches, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the referendums were divided down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers required to vote supported Māori wards, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

This year’s local government elections registered the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of citizens casting a vote, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Councils are permitted to create different wards – such as countryside seats – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements applied to Māori wards suggested the government was targeting Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that chose to keep their wards.