🔗 Share this article

The composer Avril Coleridge-Taylor continually felt the weight of her parent’s heritage. Being the child of the renowned Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, one of the best-known British musicians of the 1900s, Avril’s name was cloaked in the long shadows of history.

A World Premiere

Not long ago, I reflected on these memories as I got ready to record the first-ever recording of Avril’s 1936 piano concerto. Featuring emotional harmonies, soulful lyricism, and bold rhythms, her composition will provide audiences valuable perspective into how this artist – an artist in conflict originating from the early 1900s – conceived of her reality as a woman of colour.

Past and Present

However about legacies. One needs patience to adapt, to perceive forms as they actually appear, to separate fact from distortion, and I felt hesitant to address her history for some time.

I earnestly desired her to be a reflection of her father. To some extent, this was true. The idyllic English tones of Samuel’s influence can be observed in several pieces, such as From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). But you only have to examine the names of her parent’s works to see how he viewed himself as not only a flag bearer of English Romanticism and also a representative of the Black diaspora.

It was here that parent and child seemed to diverge.

American society assessed the composer by the brilliance of his compositions as opposed to the colour of his skin.

Parental Heritage

During his studies at the Royal College of Music, her father – the child of a African father and a British mother – started to lean into his background. When the poet of color the renowned Dunbar visited the UK in that era, the young musician eagerly sought him out. He set the poet’s African Romances to music and the subsequent year adapted his verses for a stage piece, Dream Lovers. This was followed by the choral work that put Samuel on the map: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Drawing from the poet Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, Samuel’s Hiawatha was an international hit, particularly among the Black community who felt indirect honor as the majority judged Samuel by the quality of his art rather than the colour of his skin.

Advocacy and Beliefs

Recognition did not temper his beliefs. At the turn of the century, he attended the First Pan African Conference in London where he encountered the Black American thinker this influential figure and witnessed a series of speeches, including on the oppression of the Black community there. He was a campaigner to his final days. He maintained ties with pioneers of civil rights like Du Bois and the educator Washington, spoke publicly on equality for all, and even talked about issues of racism with the US President while visiting to the US capital in that year. In terms of his art, reminisced Du Bois, “he made his mark so notably as a creative artist that it cannot soon be forgotten.” He died in that year, aged 37. But what would her father have reacted to his offspring’s move to be in this country in the mid-20th century?

Conflict and Policy

“Child of Celebrated Artist shows support to S African Bias,” declared a title in the Black American publication Jet magazine. Apartheid “seems to me the appropriate course”, the composer stated Jet. When asked to explain, she revised her statement: she didn’t agree with apartheid “fundamentally” and it “ought to be permitted to work itself out, directed by well-meaning South Africans of diverse ethnicities”. Had Avril been more attuned to her parent’s beliefs, or born in Jim Crow America, she could have hesitated about the policy. But life had protected her.

Identity and Naivety

“I have a UK passport,” she remarked, “and the officials did not inquire me about my background.” Therefore, with her “light” complexion (as described), she floated among the Europeans, buoyed up by their admiration for her late father. She presented about her family’s work at the University of Cape Town and directed the national orchestra in that location, featuring the inspiring part of her concerto, titled: “In memory of my Father.” While a accomplished player personally, she did not perform as the featured artist in her concerto. Instead, she consistently conducted as the maestro; and so the segregated ensemble played under her baton.

Avril hoped, in her own words, she “might bring a shift”. Yet in the mid-1950s, things fell apart. Once officials learned of her African heritage, she was forced to leave the land. Her UK document didn’t protect her, the diplomatic official advised her to leave or be jailed. She came home, feeling great shame as the extent of her inexperience dawned. “This experience was a painful one,” she lamented. Compounding her embarrassment was the release in 1955 of her controversial discussion, a year after her forced leaving from the country.

A Common Narrative

Upon contemplating with these legacies, I perceived a recurring theme. The narrative of holding UK citizenship until it’s revoked – which recalls Black soldiers who defended the British throughout the World War II and made it through but were refused rightful benefits. Including those from Windrush,