🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on growing your business? Do recruiters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to include what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who employ online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her audience decline significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "assertive" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Every day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced positive outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."